Energy
Too tired to start? Try a start that costs almost nothing.
It's 8 pm, you're wiped, and the task still matters. Why "I'll do it when I have energy" keeps failing, and how to begin when the tank is near empty.
By The StartKick team · October 3, 2026 · 3 min read

It's eight in the evening. The day is over. You're on the sofa, and the task you promised yourself is still there: the workout, the application, the ten emails.
You tell yourself you'll do it when you have more energy. Tomorrow morning, maybe. Or the weekend.
Then tomorrow comes, and it's the same sofa.
The frustrating part is that you're not lazy. You've worked all day. You simply have very little left, and the task asks for more than that.
Why it happens
Tired changes the maths
Piers Steel's review of the research on putting things off identifies a few strong predictors. Two of them matter here: how unpleasant a task feels, and how far away its reward is (Steel, 2007).
When you're tired, both get worse. The task feels heavier than it did at noon. And its reward, a finished application, a stronger body, is weeks away. The sofa pays out right now.
Sirois and Pychyl describe what happens next. Avoiding a task that feels bad brings quick relief (Sirois & Pychyl, 2013). Tired, you take the relief. It's the rational choice in the moment, and the wrong one over a month.
Waiting for energy is a plan with no date
"When I have more energy" sounds like a plan. It isn't one. It names no time, no place and no action. It just moves the task to a version of you who feels better, and that version is rarely on the calendar.
Peter Gollwitzer's research on simple "if-then" plans shows the alternative. People who decide in advance when and where they will act follow through far more often than people with the same goal and no plan (Gollwitzer, 1999). The plan does the work your energy would have done.
The size of the start is the lever
BJ Fogg, who runs the behaviour design lab at Stanford, built a whole method on one idea. When motivation is low, don't try to raise it. Make the behaviour so small that low motivation is enough (Fogg, 2019).
Two push-ups. One sentence. One email. These sound silly next to the real task. That's the point. They cost almost nothing, so a tired person can still pay.
Small ways in
Set a tired-day version of the task
Decide now, while you have energy, what the task looks like on a bad day. Workout: put on the shoes and do two squats. Application: open the form and fill in your name. Emails: answer the shortest one. Write it down. On the tired day, you don't decide. You read.
Do the first minute standing up
If you sit down "to think about it", the sofa wins. Do the first minute before you sit: open the file, lay out the mat, put the kettle on. Then decide.
Pair it with something you already do
Fogg calls this an anchor. "After I brush my teeth, I open the application." The habit you already have carries the start. No energy needed to remember or to choose.
Allow yourself to stop after the small version
This is the rule that makes it work. If you do the two push-ups and stop, that's a success. Most evenings you'll keep going. Some evenings you won't. Both count.
Move the real session, not the start
If the full task needs a fresh head, schedule that for when you have one. But still do the two-minute start tonight. Tomorrow's session starts in the middle, not at zero.
Try this now: Pick the task you're too tired for. Do a version that takes under two minutes. Then you're allowed to stop.
If you want a first move that fits your kind of stuck, take the StartKick check.
Sources
- Fogg, B. J. (2019). Tiny Habits: The Small Changes That Change Everything. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. https://tinyhabits.com/book/
- Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493
- Sirois, F., & Pychyl, T. (2013). Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12011
- Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65

